Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1455MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
7296 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile
2.607 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M +465%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
8192
56
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

46.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
81.48 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
5.215 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
2.607 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
81.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy