Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla M2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1200 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (18W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T1200 Mobile +183%
2.918 TFLOPS
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

855 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
448
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

45.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
91.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
5.837 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.918 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-876-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy