NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 110% (1620MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
+7%
3.553 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+55%
3220
Quadro K5200
2072
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+59%
1505
Quadro K5200
941
Blender
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+58%
463
Quadro K5200
293
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
