Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1620MHz vs 1543MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Mobile +66%
5.53 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
1328 MHz
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
1543 MHz
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.75 GPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
86.41 GFLOPS
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.530 TFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
172.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
16 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy