Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile +10345%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

60W
TDP
34W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
G96
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy