Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile +691%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy