NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1785MHz vs 1770MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
+197%
10.87 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3220
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
+184%
9149
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
1365 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
48
1024
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
113.3 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
339.8 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.75 TFLOPS
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.87 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
339.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
110W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
N19E-Q5-A1
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
