NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla M4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Tesla M4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 67% (1785MHz vs 1072MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
NVIDIA Tesla M4 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+66%
3.656 TFLOPS
Tesla M4
2.195 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3220
Tesla M4
+65%
5323
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro T2000 Mobile
1426
Tesla M4
+66%
2375
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Nov 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
872 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1072 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
34.30 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.61 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.195 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
68.61 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GM206
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
