Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1785MHz vs 1500MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 165W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Mobile +509%
22.27 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
975 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
58
1024
Shading Units
7424
64
TMUs
232
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.0 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.27 TFLOPS
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.27 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
165W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GA103
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
22 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy