Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1785MHz vs 1530MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +328%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
1312 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
80
1024
Shading Units
5120
64
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GV100
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy