Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro VX 200 and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
6032 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro VX 200
0.252 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900 +24233%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro VX
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
96
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
6144
56
TMUs
384
16
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
96
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
252.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
295W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Tesla
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy