Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon 550 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

AMD Radeon 550 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon 550 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 550 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1183MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (56.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
472 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon 550 +3684%
1.211 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Jan 2009
Polaris
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

1100 MHz
Base Clock
-
1183 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
56.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
40
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

18.93 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
37.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
1211 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1211 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
75.71 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
RV620
Lexa PRO (215-0904018)
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy