Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon 550 vs ATI FirePro V4800

AMD Radeon 550 vs ATI FirePro V4800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon 550 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 550 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1183MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
112 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 69W)
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 56.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon 550 +95%
1.211 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Apr 2010
Polaris
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1100 MHz
Base Clock
-
1183 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
56.00GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
400
32
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

18.93 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
37.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
1211 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1211 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
75.71 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
69W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Redwood
Lexa PRO (215-0904018)
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy