Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon 550 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

AMD Radeon 550 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon 550 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 550 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1183MHz vs 925MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 56.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon 550
1.211 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265 +56%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Feb 2014
Polaris
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1100 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1183 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
56.00GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

18.93 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
37.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
1211 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1211 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
75.71 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Lexa PRO (215-0904018)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy