Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition

ATI Radeon E2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E2400
0.048 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition +3927%
1.933 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Apr 2013
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1344
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.13 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
80.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
48.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.933 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
80.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N13E-GSR-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy