Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps

ATI Radeon E2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 31W)
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1575MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E2400
0.048 TFLOPS
GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps +5779%
2.822 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Aug 2020
Embedded
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1575 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
40
Shading Units
896
4
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.40 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
88.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.645 TFLOPS
48.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.822 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
88.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
31W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
N18S-G5
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy