Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E2400 vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

ATI Radeon E2400 vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 460 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)
AMD Radeon Pro 460 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock907MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (81.28GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E2400
0.048 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 460 +3770%
1.858 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Oct 2016
Embedded
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
907 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
81.28GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1024
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.51 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.05 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.858 TFLOPS
48.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.858 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
116.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
Baffin
-
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
3 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy