Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E2400 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

ATI Radeon E2400 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2008 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E2400
0.048 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +7656%
3.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
May 2015
Embedded
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
48.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
5 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy