Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E2400 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

ATI Radeon E2400 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
3032 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E2400
0.048 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +25629%
12.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
Embedded
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
40
Shading Units
3072
4
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
48.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy