Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs AMD FirePro M6000

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs AMD FirePro M6000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM and 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 43W)
AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
FirePro M6000 +166%
1.024 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Jul 2012
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
10
320
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1024 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
Heathrow
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
GPU Variant
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
43W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy