Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs AMD FirePro M8900

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900 +240%
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Apr 2011
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
12
320
Shading Units
960
32
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
Blackcomb
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy