Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1515MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile +708%
3.103 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Apr 2020
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1380 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1515 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
320
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.48 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.96 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.205 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.103 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
96.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
TU117
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
GPU Variant
N18P-G61-MP2
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy