Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile +260%
1.385 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Jul 2019
Embedded
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.31 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.62 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1385 GFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1385 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
86.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
Polaris 23
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GLM
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy