Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
2752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +3282%
12.99 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Mar 2023
Embedded
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1635 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
320
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
AD107
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy