Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E8950 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

AMD Radeon E8950 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E8950 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 112% (2115MHz vs 1000MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E8950
4.096 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +217%
12.99 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
Embedded
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

735 MHz
Base Clock
1635 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
2048
Shading Units
3072
128
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
256.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
AD107
E8950
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy