Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM and 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 50W)
Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 64% (2000MHz vs 1219MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9171 MCM
1.248 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A30M +228%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
Aug 2022
Embedded
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1124 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
DG2-128
Lexa MCM Pro
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy