Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs AMD FirePro W6170M

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs AMD FirePro W6170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM and 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
AMD FirePro W6170M 's Advantages
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9171 MCM
1.248 TFLOPS
FirePro W6170M +57%
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
Aug 2014
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1124 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
14
512
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Emerald
Lexa MCM Pro
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy