Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 260M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 40W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9171 MCM +372%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 260M
0.264 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
Jun 2009
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1124 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
12
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
96
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
264.0 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
GT215
Lexa MCM Pro
GPU Variant
N10E-GS
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
38W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy