Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1515MHz vs 1219MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9171 MCM
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile +148%
3.103 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
Apr 2020
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1124 MHz
Base Clock
1380 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
1515 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
512
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.48 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.96 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.205 TFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.103 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
TU117
Lexa MCM Pro
GPU Variant
N18P-G61-MP2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy