Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs AMD Radeon R9 M485X

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs AMD Radeon R9 M485X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM and 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 M485X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M485X 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9171 MCM
1.248 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M485X +137%
2.961 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
May 2016
Embedded
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1124 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
32
512
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.14 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.54 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.961 TFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.961 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
185.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Amethyst
Lexa MCM Pro
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
5 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy