AMD Radeon E9174 MXM vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9174 MXM and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 65% (2010MHz vs 1219MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9174 MXM
1.248 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+889%
12.35 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2017
Release Date
Mar 2023
Embedded
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1124 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
512
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Lexa
GPU Name
AD107
E9170
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
