Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9175 PCIe vs AMD FirePro M3900

AMD Radeon E9175 PCIe vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9175 PCIe and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9175 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9175 PCIe +420%
1.248 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
Oct 2010
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1124 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
160
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Seymour
E9170
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy