Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9260 MXM vs AMD FirePro M3900

AMD Radeon E9260 MXM vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9260 MXM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9260 MXM +795%
2.15 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Oct 2010
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1090 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
896
Shading Units
160
48
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
57.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
2.150 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
134.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
Seymour
Baffin PRO
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy