Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9260 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q

AMD Radeon E9260 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9260 MXM 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1291MHz vs 1200MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9260 MXM +8%
2.15 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q
1.983 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Jan 2018
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 10 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1090 MHz
Base Clock
1152 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
896
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
57.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.97 GTexel/s
2.150 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
30.98 GFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.983 TFLOPS
134.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.97 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
GP107
Baffin PRO
GPU Variant
N17P-G1-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Pascal
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy