Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M

AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 PCIe and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9260 PCIe +795%
2.15 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250M
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Jun 2009
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1090 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
896
Shading Units
96
48
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
57.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
2.150 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
134.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
28W
-
-
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
GT215
Baffin E9260 (216-0885288)
GPU Variant
N10E-GE-A2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy