Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9390 PCIe and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1089MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9390 PCIe +389%
3.903 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2019
Release Date
Unknown
Embedded
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

713 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
1089 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
1792
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

34.85 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
122.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
3.903 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
3.903 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
243.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
GP108B
-
-
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Pascal
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy