Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +95%
5.834 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2.989 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
May 2015
Embedded
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
-
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
1792
144
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Amethyst
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
5 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy