Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 320SP and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1400MHz vs 1150MHz)
Lower TDP (15W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Graphics 320SP +21%
0.896 TFLOPS
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
0.736 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
Jun 2013
Renoir
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

400 MHz
Base Clock
200 MHz
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
5
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
320
20
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.00 GTexel/s
1.792 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
896.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
736.0 GFLOPS
56.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
184.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Renoir
GPU Name
Haswell GT3e
-
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Generation 7.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
7 nm
Process Size
22 nm
9.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
156 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

15W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.0
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy