Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT vs AMD FirePro W7100

ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT vs AMD FirePro W7100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 GT and 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1552 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 GT
0.288 TFLOPS
FirePro W7100 +1044%
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
3
Compute Units
28
240
Shading Units
1792
12
TMUs
112
12
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.212 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
7.212 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
288.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Tonga
R600 GT (215RGFDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
5 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy