Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs AMD FirePro W4000

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000 +229%
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Aug 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Pitcairn
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy