Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 PRO +193%
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Sep 2010
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
10.66GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
320
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
130.6 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GT216
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
GT216-305-A3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy