Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +1050%
4.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Nov 2019
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
320
Shading Units
1280
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
TU116
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy