Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
Lower TDP (182W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 +24%
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Jun 2008
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
320
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
182W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GT200
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy