Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO 's Advantages
80 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 289W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295 +55%
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
320
Shading Units
240
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
289W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GT200B
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy