CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
VS
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (185W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
+640%
2.842 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
VS
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
Graphics Card
Dec 2007
Release Date
Jan 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
24
320
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
88.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.842 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
710.4 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
Tahiti
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Board Design
200W
TDP
185W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI Radeon HD 5450 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
2
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
3
ATI Radeon HD 5850 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
4
AMD Radeon HD 7750 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
6
AMD Radeon RX 560 XT vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
7
ATI Radeon HD 5490 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO
8
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs AMD FirePro W5000
9
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
10
ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy