Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 PRO and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 PRO
0.384 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X +966%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon R600
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Tahiti
R600 PRO (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy