Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs ATI FirePro V8750

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs ATI FirePro V8750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8750 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 106.0GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (151W vs 215W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 XT
0.476 TFLOPS
FirePro V8750 +152%
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Jul 2008
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
828 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
106.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
800
16
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
11.89 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
475.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

215W
TDP
151W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
RV770
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy