Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs AMD FirePro W8000

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (215W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 106.0GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 XT
0.476 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +577%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
828 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
106.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
11.89 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
475.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

215W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Tahiti
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy