Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs NVIDIA NVS 510

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs NVIDIA NVS 510

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (106.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 215W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 XT +55%
0.476 TFLOPS
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Oct 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
828 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
106.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
11.89 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
-
-
-
475.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS

Board Design

215W
TDP
35W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GK107
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy