Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 106.0GB/s)
2752 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (190W vs 215W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2900 XT
0.476 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +6612%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Nov 2023
Radeon R600
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
828 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
106.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
48
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
3072
16
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
11.89 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
475.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

215W
TDP
190W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Navi 32
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Navi 32
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy